Abstract Objective: To investigate the clinical effect and complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for treating women with cervical cancer. Methods: The clinical data of 120 women with cervical cancer from July 2013 to July 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, which included 60 women treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy (LRH) in study group and 60 women treated by radical abdominal hysterectomy (ARH) in control group. The clinical effect, complication rate, and postoperative quality of life of women were compared between the two groups. Results: The hospital stay time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, and out-of-bed time of women in the study group were 7.4±2.1d, 81.0±8.1ml, 28.1±4.3h, and 5.1±1.1h, respectively, which were significant shorter than those of women in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of FSH, estradiol, and luteinogen had increased significantly after operation, but which had no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). The quality of life score of women had increased significantly 3 months after the operation, and the score of the women in study was 89.11±7.32 points, which was significant higher than that (64.16±6.17 points) of women in the control group (P<0.05). The rates of infection, bladder injury and tumor recurrence, and survival rate of women in the study group were 1.7%, 1.7%, 25.0%, and 60.0%, respectively, which had no significant different from those of women in the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both LRH and ARH for treating women with cerical cancer have the similar clinical efficacy, tumor recurrence and mortality, which can increase the level of estrogen significantly and reduce the complications, However, the recovery time after LRH treatment is shorter and the quality of life is better.
|
